5 of 5 · 36–43 AH / 657–664 CE · Siffin, Dumat al-Jandal and Fustat
'Amr ibn al-'As رضي الله عنه
Siffin, the Arbitration and the Last Days
After 'Uthman's murder, a deep division opened among the Muslims. 'Amr took the side of Mu'awiyah, who demanded justice for 'Uthman's killers, and the two armies met at Siffin in 37 AH. Among those killed on the side of 'Ali was 'Ammar ibn Yasir, of whom the Prophet ﷺ had said that a rebel party would kill him. Sunni scholars treat 'Ali as closer to the truth in this conflict, and honour those on the other side as fellow Companions who made a mistaken judgement or took a different path. They refrain from condemning any of them, as the Qur'an warns against reviling the believers who came before.
When the fighting was stopped by the proposal of arbitration, 'Amr represented Mu'awiyah and Abu Musa al-Ash'ari represented 'Ali. A well-known story says 'Amr tricked Abu Musa into announcing the deposition of both men and then declared Mu'awiyah the caliph. Many scholars, among them Ibn al-'Arabi, rejected this story on the grounds that it comes from Abu Mikhnaf, a narrator whom the hadith critics consider unreliable.
'Amr later governed Egypt again, and died there around 43 AH. On his deathbed he turned his face to the wall and wept, and said that he had once been the Prophet ﷺ's enemy, then his companion, then had been tried by the power of this world. He asked his sons to bury him gently, to stay at his grave for as long as it takes to slaughter a camel and share its meat, so he could take comfort and know how to answer the messengers of his Lord. He placed his hope in Allah's mercy.
Honour is kept by restraint in the face of civil strife, and our last word should be hope in Allah's mercy.
How can you speak about people who disagreed with each other without taking a side against any of them?
- Sahih al-Bukhari 447 Sahih · in the two Sahihs
- Sahih Muslim 2915 Sahih · in the two Sahihs
- Sahih Muslim 121 Sahih · in the two Sahihs
- Ibn al-'Arabi, al-'Awasim min al-QawasimHistorical report
- al-Dhahabi, Siyar A'lam al-Nubala'Historical report
What the hadith grades mean
- Sahih (authentic): an unbroken chain of trustworthy, precise narrators, free of hidden flaws or contradiction. It is acted upon.
- Hasan (good): like sahih, but a narrator's precision is slightly lighter. It is also accepted and acted upon. "Hasan sahih" means it reaches sahih by its routes.
- Da'if (weak): a break in the chain or a narrator who is not reliable enough. It is not used to establish beliefs or rulings.
- Very weak (munkar, matruk): a seriously flawed chain or a narrator accused of lying. It is not relied on at all.
- Mawdu' (fabricated): falsely attributed to the Prophet ﷺ. It may not be narrated as his words except to warn against it.
- The two Sahihs: every hadith with a full chain in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim is accepted as sahih by the scholars of hadith.
- Historical report: biographies and histories (Ibn Ishaq, Ibn Sa'd, al-Tabari) record events with chains that are often incomplete. They are used for the story, not for rulings.
- Hadith scholars grade a narration; the four madhhabs do not. Where a hadith carries a ruling, the page shows which schools act on it.
Create a free account to keep your place as you go. Create a free account · Sign in